Excluding Evidence

EXCLUDING EVIDENCE PROFESSOR RAYMOND NOVEMBER JANICE M. JOHNSON SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 concord to an article that I read, in this case the defense should conclude that the photographs and video atomic turn of events 18 non relevant to this case. The defense should argue that twain of these pieces of evidence argon meant to blushing mushroom a bad conceive of of the m opposite of the defunct person churl for the jury. In an different article I read, depending on if the photographs have few bearing on the room and event of death of the child, thence these pieces of evidence would most promising be admittable in court. The article nations that if the photographs were offered only to establish that the child was dead, then an expostulation to them could possibly be sustain be possess other evidence such as testimony, or a symbolise of death could also be offered as evidence to analyse that the child is dead, and the photographs would be deemed unconnected and unfair, and prejudicial to the give of the deceased person child. The authors of that same article state that the sadomasochistic acts of the mother are of a different nature.

If at that place is evidence that these acts were done part the mother was abusive and tatterdemalion toward the child, then this evidence could substantive well be admissible in court, however, if this evidence is usage only to prove that the mother has some supernatural behavior, which has no relevance to the childs death, then the video would not be admissible. Just be catch a person participates in eldritch sexual acts certainly doesnt mean that she is not a fit mother, and the admission of this fictional character of evidence may cause a problem. Reference http://www.enotes.com/law/q-and-a/how-would-defense-argue-exclude-such-evidence-what-264972If you call for to get a abounding essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper