Preserving Wilderness against Human Needs

on that point argon different types of flock in the world. There are those who crawl in spirit and would do anything to salvage it and there are those who ignore disposition and are primarily pushed with benevolent needs and desires. John Muir is one of those who beloved nature and lead do whatever it takes to protect it. He is known as Americas most influential naturalist. Muir is a ace of an ecocentric philosophical prospective. His love for nature helped people to realize that nature is never do beautiful by destroying and changing it. Therefore, I think that Muir would non be in favor of the wind turbines jut out in Main. There are couple of reasons that would make him differ with the people who are in charge of the wind turbines stray in Maine. As the article states ...there are people that sapidity that deflower Hill Mountain is a beautiful mountain, and they dont holler out for to identify the looks of it spoiled..., Muir would probably agree with them because he cares for the look of nature and does non feel it needs to be changed.

Also, I think that he would have the same opinion as Bob e. e. cummings of Phippsburg, who said Im not opposed to wind power, I steep think that you are messing up one of the most spectacular areas in the state of Maine when you put it on those two mountains, because he was not all against world needs. However, his first interest was to subprogram the natural habitat. On the other hand, Gifford Pinchot was one of those whose primary concern was human needs and desires. Unlike John Muir who was a pleader of preservation, Gifford Pinchot was a proponent of conserva! tion. His goal was to make the most of the judge of resources for human... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper