Sixth Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

ordinal Amendment - Essay Exampleal differences and that each system has its own strengths that draw and quarter them superior to each separate in particular, American proceedings are superior to the Chinese system, because it allows the masses to hear and to influence cases and it is little open to corruption, although the Chinese proceedings do have the advantage of expertise analysis.Cultural differences impact how the vile justice system is perceived and executed. Western courts, like the American courts, believe that justice is for the victim the exclusive has rights that the state must defend and protect (Deflem & Swygart, 2001). As a result, the American proceedings use venire trials to ensure that a group of individuals protect their fellow individuals civil rights. The Chinese culpable system, on the contrary, is a communist system and it believes that the criminal justice system should serve the interests of the state (Deflem & Swygart, 2001). It has no jury trials, unlike the American system, and it uses a panel of judge (Dammer & Albanese, 2011, p.131). The Chinese system also emphasizes the exculpation of the defendant than the testimony of the witnesses (Dammer & Albanese, 2011, p.131).This essay believes that there is no superior court system, since people have pagan differences that would make them prefer one system to another however, the American and Chinese court procedures have advantages that make them superior to each other. American proceedings are superior to the Chinese system, because it allows the masses to hear and to decide on cases. Unlike the Chinese court system, only judges hear the cases and if they come from the upper or middle class, they may be biased toward their own social classes. The American system is also slight vulnerable to corruption. The Chinese government appoints the judges for its criminal justice courts and it can easily select judges who are partial to their interests. Still, the Chinese proceedings do have the advantage of expertise analysis. The