The Death Penalty is a Just and Proper Punishment :: Pro Capital Punishment Death Penalty Crime Essays

The Death Penalty is a Just and Proper PunishmentThe idea of putting some other human to death is hard to whole fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death convict on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding. I know it must be painful, dehumanizing, and sickening. However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our state as a society to see that it is done.Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments. The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chancethat there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether thedeath penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and aninnocent person is executed, wherefore the problem lies in the court system,not in the death penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, inwhich humans are involved, possess a possibility of defacement or death. Co nstruction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility ofaccidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. These activities continue to take place, and continue to once in a while takehuman lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that theadvantages outgo the unintended loss. We have also decided that theadvantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweighthe losses of the offender. The second argument against capital punishment is that it isunfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor andminorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. erst again, thisis a separate issue. It cant be disputed sadly, the rich are more likely to get off with alesser sentence, and this bias is wrong. However, this is yet anotherproblem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is nota valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against thecourts and their unfair system of sent encing. The trio argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by somesupporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capitalpunishment reduces rampageous crimes. Opponents of the death penalty do notagree and have a valid argument when they say, The claims that capitalpunishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and for sure notproven. I am not refuting this accusation. In fact, statistics show that thedeath penalty neither lowers or raises the incidence of violent crimes.